Aamir Vs. Ultra Z and Smily Random for multiaccounting

if you have no proof i win

You have no idea how law works, do you?

You have nothing on me, so nobody could find me guilty.

...To clarify, I wholeheartedly deny the charges.

i summon the user ultra z to the stand

Yo.

if you ar enot real i summon you to show your true self to me at school

I refuse.

you refuse on what grounds

On the grounds that I have no reason to.

i ask for a court order for ultraz user to reveal him self

Allow me to pose a hypothetical question.

If you "win" how and with what do you plan on charging me?

i sentece you to revel you rtrue form

Allow me to rephrase. How... what am I charged with and how is it applicable to me?

charged with reavling your self and you must mett me in school

You're still not understanding. What crime have I commited?

multiacounting

Can you prove that's a crime?

it is against the forum rules

Did you read on to the part where Guardians are granted immunity from prosecution by normal users?

so cos ur an admin u can multi account

Being an admin puts me above the rules as long as Smiley allows it.

so ur admitting u are multiaccounting

I entirely deny the charges. This was a hypothetical line of questioning.

you shouldent be above the law even the priminister isnt above the law

That's irrelevant. The prime minister is not an admin.

he basically is but of the country